Game changer – E-Learning Provocateur
As a blogger, I have been battling.
Historically it has been a fulfilling pastime for me – both equally individually and vocation wise – but it has also been difficult. It’s time consuming, it involves massive doses of vulnerability, and on event the response from my fellow “professionals” has been downright unprofessional.
Mix that with some non-public issues and a dwindling readership, I have been wondering if it is truly worth it any much more.
Prior to publishing I really do not know before this yr, an illustration tweeted by Severe Darji confident me to give it yet another crack and I felt passionately more than enough about reworking conventional electronic education into blended mastering experiences to adhere to it up with a prospective final hurrah.
Which prompted me to surprise: What do I really feel passionate about?
Soon after ruminating over the dilemma for a shockingly prolonged time, I’ve concluded that my passion is mother nature and its conservation.
I analyzed environmental biology at uni and bought my 1st whole-time position in drinking water management, ahead of the trajectory of my profession thrusted me deep into the corporate realm. Which is not essentially a poor thing, it’s just unique.
Right after even more pondering, I also recognised that I’m fascinated by cryptozoology. Not so substantially of the Bigfoot selection – while I do come across that entertaining and from time to time insightful, especially when the investigators utilize cutting-edge know-how but instead additional along the lines of no matter whether the Tasmanian Tiger (Thylacinus cynocephalus) continue to exists on the Apple Isle or in pockets on the mainland, or whether large cats (Panthera spp.) roam the Australian countryside.
Getting finished a honest share of it myself, I can convey to you that organic surveying is a difficult small business. Traditional techniques of figuring out the numerous species that inhabit a supplied location – eg observation, monitoring, scat evaluation, cage trapping, movement-sensing images – are a little bit strike and overlook, to be frank. To get a sense of the magnitude of the job, visualize trekking by means of the Amazon forest… you know jaguars live there, but you just about definitely will not see one.
In that mild, finding a cryptid is really hard – if not they wouldn’t be cryptids. Even when movie evidence is forthcoming, it’s infuriatingly inconclusive.
Which sales opportunities me to an additional curiosity: Environmental DNA. Abbreviated to eDNA, this time period refers to the examination of moment traces of natural and organic matter in samples of soil, drinking water and even air to identify the wildlife that’s current in the vicinity.
I look at eDNA a sport changer, not only for cryptozoology but also for mainstream ecology. A scenario in level is the University of Otago’s look for for the Loch Ness Monster. Although this foray unsuccessful to obtain the fabled plesiosaur, it did showcase a novel technique to organic surveying that uncovered evidence of a whopping 3,000 species in the water. Not only aquatic animals these types of as salmon, pike and eel, but also terrestrial animals this sort of as rabbit, badger and vole (presumably because of rain washing detritus into the lake from the encompassing catchment).
I’m so enamoured by eDNA that I urge the scientific group to give it a suitable go before we “resurrect” the Tasmanian Tiger by way of Jurassic Park-model genetic engineering.
I’d also be delighted to see it made use of in the hunt for major cats down under, if not to establish they exist, then to establish that they do not.
Owning explained that, I realise eDNA is no magic bullet. To begin with, it’s a snapshot: for case in point, the University of Otago’s study failed to detect animals this kind of as seals and otters which are known to pay a visit to the loch. Then of system you have the politics of science to contend with: fuelled by anecdotes these kinds of as the a person about the leopard scat sampled from a nearby zoo being determined as “dog” by a cautious lab.
In spite of its restrictions, having said that, I contend that eDNA will revolutionise our review of biodiversity.
Lest I stray as well much off topic, I’ll conclude by reaffirming what we already know about Discovering & Growth: we also advantage from the improvement of know-how.
Amid the increase of digital fact, synthetic intelligence and the metaverse, what do you look at to be our game changer?